Reviews of "Got You On My mind" |
Post Reply |
Author | |
willgalison
New Member Joined: April 22 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Reviews of "Got You On My mind" Posted: May 11 2005 at 4:54pm |
Here are some nice reviews of the CD, "Got You On My Mind"
featuring Madeleine Peyroux and me, William Galison. Rich Hansonis going to post them in Madi's discography in the next few days In the meantime, here they are for your perusal. The colored ones are links. The black ones are not links, so you have to copy and paste the addresses to your browser. http://www.popmatters.com/music/reviews/g/galisonwilliam- gotyou.shtml http://www.musicbox-online.com/mp-care.html http://www.jazznow.com/0205/0205NS/NSGalPey.html http:// www.jazzpolice.com/content/view/5027/2/1/1/ http:/ /www.jazzitude.com/galisonpeyroux_mind.htm http://www.bluesartstudio.at/NeueSeiten/2005CD01.html http://blog.jazz-not-jazz.com/archives/2005/02/25/william- galison-and-madeleine-peyroux-got-you-on-my-mind/ http://citypaper.net/articles/2004-09-02/music2.shtml http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2004-09-02/music/ hearthere3.html http://www.tollbooth.org/2005/reviews/wgmp.html http://www.30music.com/rev.php?rev=971&action=searchRev& term=peyroux#edit http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=14919 Thanks! William Edited by willgalison |
|
higglety
New Member Joined: February 12 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Quote Reply Posted: May 18 2005 at 8:15pm |
I'm glad that these prestigious magazines and websites are
backing up my opinion of "Got you on my mind". Has anyone seen a bad review? Hey Rich Hansen! It's been over a week since galison posted these links. When are you going to put them up on madeleinepeyroux.org It couldn't take more than a couple of minutes. After denying the existence of this CD for the past eight months, the leaset you could do would be to throw up the reviews. C'mon buddy, we thought you embraced democracy a few weeks back. Looks like there's 1,100 fans interested in "Got You on my mind" so far". That would seem like a good reason to post reviews, don't you think? We're behind you Rich, don't let us down! Higgs PS Still no word from Rounder or Madeliene on the jazzpolice story??? |
|
higglety
|
|
WebMaster
Admin Group Joined: June 06 2004 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 115 |
Quote Reply Posted: May 18 2005 at 9:20pm |
I will get the reviews on the site in due course. Nothing sinister just have other demands on my time.
|
|
Rich Hanson
www.madeleinepeyroux.org |
|
smooth
New Member Joined: May 21 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Quote Reply Posted: June 11 2005 at 2:52am |
Dear Mr. Higglety,
I see you have incessantly requested a direct response to Galison's allegations regarding this lawsuit. Have you considered the fact that while in the midst of a lawsuit, one's comment on the matters, especially in public and in writing, are held in an different light, and can cause trouble for all concerned parties? Why not wait for the outcome of the lawsuit before stomping around on other people's time to come clean? After all, you seem to be more interested in the lawsuit itself than the record it refers to, from the look of your posts. And that makes one wonder what you are so "Pissed" about. On a forum that has a lot of elegance and good manner, your posts are coming from quite a different place, an angry place I think, and you are the only one that has been consistent in that regard. Most of us are focusing on joy, and music. And frankly, I find a lack in that very dissappointing. Better to let the self-righteous fill their own cup, and allow the webmaster to do his job as he best can as well. I wish you all the better peace of mind, and hope it worth the wait now. ~ another late night reading |
|
willgalison
New Member Joined: April 22 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
Quote Reply Posted: June 14 2005 at 9:21pm |
Dear Smooth,
I was looking forward to reading Higglety’s response to your post, but he seems to be taking a time out from the fracus. However, your post merits a response, so I’ll try to answer for him. I hope Rich Hansen will be elegant and well-mannered enough to not censor this response, as he has not censored your posting. To begin with, I am not afraid to discuss the lawsuit in public and in writing, because I have nothing to hide. In fact I am willing to answer any question from any fan who wishes to contact me, personally or on this forum. Regarding focusing on “music and joy”: this whole lawsuit started in December 2003 when Madeleine’s lawyer was told I would be selling GYOMM and accused me of marketing a bootleged “demo” (which is now a felony in New York) and threatened to charge any distributor or record company that sold GYOMM with the same crime (copyright infringement). The only way I could prove that these allegations were false was to take Madeleine, her lawyer and Rounder Records to Federal court, where Madeleine suddenly produced an affidavit swearing that they had all been mistaken for the past five months, and I that I was indeed the joint-owner of the seven song GYOMM and the co-author of the song “Playin” (which Madeleine had previously claimed to have written herself). Had I not taken this action, I would not have found a distributor and thousands of Madeleine’s fans would not be enjoying GYOMM, not to mention prominent critics like the editor of Downbeat, who seems to prefer GYOMM to Careless Love. Madeleine’s lawyer was not focusing on music and joy when he falsely accused me of physically abusing Madeleine, which is the subject of a libel trial pending in New York Supreme Court. Madeleine’s affectionate and apologetic letters to me, (up to one month before the allegations were made and months after I last saw her) will be posted on the internet soon. Nor was Madeleine focusing on music and joy when she sued me last week for a million dollars (plus legal expenses) for: -using her name on the album cover of GYOMM. (After claiming that seven songs from GYOMM were made as a demo of her singing with me as an “accompanying musician” -who happened to pay for 90% of the recording). Question for Madeleine: Who's names should be on the CD????? -Breaching a purely fictional “verbal agreement” (of which no evidence exists) that allegedly prevented me from selling GYOMM anywhere but at her shows, (which she barred me from playing or attending a few months after the the CD was recorded). Why in God's name would i agree to a deal like that? And why didn't Madeleine make a deal in writing? Because no sane person would ever have signed it! Why didn't Madeleine's contract with Rounder stipulate that I was not allowed to sell the CD? Because I am. Was Rounder depending on a verbal agreement to give Madi a major recording contract? .......Hello? -And......ready? .... for not paying her royalties for GYOMM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! As soon as I am allowed to earn back my investment of $80,000, I will joyously pay Madeleine. However this will be much more difficult if I cannot use her name on the cover or have to spend all my money paying legal bills and a million dollar penalty. Otherwise, Madeleine will soon be receiving many times as much per record sold as she gets from Rounder. This whole mess originates from these documented facts: Madeleine’s lawyer Jeff Greenberg falsely told Rounder that GYOMM was a “demo” owned entirely b |
|
smooth
New Member Joined: May 21 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Quote Reply Posted: June 15 2005 at 1:39am |
Mr. Galison,
It seems that you too have put yourself in a dark spot, since you admit here that you actually started a lawsuit against Madeleine yourself: The only way I could prove that these allegations were false was to take Madeleine, her lawyer and Rounder Records to Federal court, where Madeleine suddenly produced an affidavit swearing that they had all been mistaken for the past five months, and I that I was indeed the joint-owner of the seven song GYOMM and the co-author of the song “Playin” (which Madeleine had previously claimed to have written herself). Do you really think it wise to discuss legal information on the public web? Why are there only seven songs on the "demo"and twelve on the "release"? If you are the "joint-owner of this cd", who is the other owner? Do you really intend to provide documents that prove so many things? such as: Madeleine’s affectionate and apologetic letters... or: Madeleine’s lawyer Jeff Greenberg falsely told Rounder that GYOMM was a “demo” owned entirely by Madeleine and that I was merely an accompanying musician. This is explicitly documented in court records which will be posted on the internet in the next week or so. ...Frankly, as a fan of Madeleine's music, I feel that you have begun to irritate fans like myself with your descent into litiginous postings, allegations that i don't invite into my life. Any future posting of "legal documents" that you have also make one ask themselves what joy and happiness you really intend to bring. The world, in its darkness, demands more from talented artists like yourselves, not this. Please make an effort to overcome this- as it causes us all due harm. ~smooth |
|
willgalison
New Member Joined: April 22 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
Quote Reply Posted: June 15 2005 at 10:50pm |
Dear Smooth,
I will try to answer your questions as plainly as possible. First of all, I do not feel that I am in a dark place. I am in a painful, expensive, and tragic place but I feel no shame in initiating the lawsuits. I was attacked and I acted to defend myself, as you or any other self-respecting person would do. Specifically, Jeffrey Greenberg and Rounder threatened to charge me with a federal crime if i did not surrender a CD that I rightfully own, spent tens of thousands to make, and am extremely proud of . Greenberg also falsely accused me of physically abusing my former girlfriend (Madi) and of "criminal harrassment" and sent these accusations to influential members of the music community, in which i have been making my living for the past 25 years. He also threatened my business associates with criminal prosecution if they sold GYOMM, causing them to cancel our contract and withdraw GYOMM from the market. I spoke at length by phone and exchanged and e-mails with Ken Irwin, the owner of Rounder, imploring him to tell Greenberg to withdraw the libelous statements and threats so that I wouldn't have to take this matter to court. (I will be posting these letters on the website.) Irwin said it was in the hands of his legal department who he trusted to do the ethical thing- , then Rounder moved to have a "protective order" placed against me so that I could not contact them (the judge angrilly rejected the motion as baseless). As a very last resort, I filed a complaint. This has cost me many thousands of dollars, dominated nearly two years of my life, and has taken a serious toll on my health and peace of mind. Still, I have no regrets, nor doubts that i am doing the right thing, and i will pursue this case to the bitter end. Even if I lose in court, i will have published the pertinent documents that expose the outrageous injustice that has taken place. You ask, "Do you think it is wise to discuss legal information on the public web?" and :"Do you really intend to provide documents....?" I sincerely hope that is not meant as a threat. The answer to both questions is yes. i have done everything I could to insulate Madeleine from the consequences her colleagues have brought on themselves. I even offered to release her 100% from the lawsuit with guaranteed immunity if she would simply withdraw her libelous statements and declassify her correspondence with Greenberg. If Greenberg were guiltless, they both would have walked away from the case free of consequences. Madeleine refused. i wiil publish that offer as well. Rounder and Greenberg may ultimately outspend and outlawyer me, but they will soon be seen by the world for what they are and for what they have done. If Madi chooses to align herself with these parties, her complicity will also be exposed. That would be a tragedy, and so i remain cautiously open to conciliation with Madi at least, To answer your other questions: There were seven songs on the original version of GYOMM because that was the number of songs we could finish before travelling to Germany to perform with the Dresden Philharmonic Orchestra. We sold many CD's at that concert as affidavits will confirm. There are eleven songs on the final version of GYOMM because Madeleine and i both wanted to make GYOMM a full length CD. On 8/18 2003,- two weeks after she stopped performing with me- Madeleine wrote to her manager Cynthia Herbst: “Although I have not< |
|
willgalison
New Member Joined: April 22 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 25 |
Quote Reply Posted: June 25 2005 at 11:26pm |
Update;
Still, no request has yet been made from Madeleine, her manager or lawyers, for the publishing check that I am waiting to send or for any other payment for GYOMM. I have been strictly warned by Madi's lawyer Wendy Stryker that any form of contact with Madeleine will be considered "harrassment", so neither I nor my representatives are allowed to send the check without a request. The moment my lawyer receives a request, zoom!...the check goes out from his office. Meanwhile, Madeleine's $1,000,000 lawsuit against me for not paying her for the CD her other lawyer has been desperately trying to suppress out of existence for the past two years, is still pending..... ? ! What a whicky-whacky world! Best, William PS: Sincere thanks for the letters of support from Madi's fans, both on and off this forum. |
|
Post Reply |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |